Questions for the Applications breakout sessions. [These sessions will precede and feed into the crosscutting sessions on Mathematical Methods and Computer Science/Infrastructure.] (1) What is the new science that could be achieved with a substantial increment in computational capability ? - What could be achieved with 100 times the current computing capabilities ? Same question for 1000 times the current capabilities ? - What new experimental or observational capabilities require such an increment to design or understand ? - Why now for this activity? Why hasn't it already been done ? Why can't it wait for another 10 years ? (2) Starting from the computational capabilities (hardware, algorithms, and software) currently available in your field, what are the barriers to achieving the goals in (1) ? - What are the hardware barriers ? - What are the algorithmic barriers ? - What are the software barriers ? (3) How would you measure success ? - What specific qualitative or quantitative increments in computational capability would lead to specific scientific accomplishments ? - What existing or planned experimental, observational, or theoretical results would serve to validate any new computational capability ? - For each major increment in capability give a one-sentence description and a year by which that increment could be achieved (the latter assuming that the requisite hardware is available by that time). (4) What are the resources required ? - Characterise the current simulation capabilities, in terms of size of software base and level of capability ? How does it differ from that which would be required to achieve the goals in (1) ? - What level of effort would be required to move from the current capability to the one required to achieve the goals in (1) ? Specify in terms of the number of people, number of teams, and skill level. - How long would it take to develop the new capabilities ? - What is the level of hardware resources required ? - What resources and institutional commitments would need to be made to support the software investment over its lifetime. As a starting point for this exercise, assume a 20 year lifetime. - Who currently funds related activities, and at what level ? (5) Provide summaries of the argument for undertaking this work that could be used to persuade a variety of audiences ? - An eye-catching title. - A summary that fits on a 3x5 index card that could make the case to a member of Congress. - A two-page document that would make the case to someone involved with science policy, e.g. an OMB budget examiner or an OSTP or congressional staffer. - A longer document that would make the case to your scientific peers, particularly to those not involved in simulation. - A single power-point slide.